Last night I watched the beginning (but missed the rest) of Oprah’s Big Give show. I loved the premise – provide someone with $2,500 and the person who does the best job at raising the most money wins.
At the heart of the show was that you had to go and meet the person or people you were helping. As a result, the pressure wasn’t just to perform – it was truly not to let the people down that you were there to help.
What I’ve read as a follow up is that the $2,500 was really inconsequential. The $2,500 was really just to enable you not to worry about transportation, phone calls, organization, etc. The real money was at the other end of a phone call to a company or a celebrity. If you really concentrate on where and how you’re going to spend the $2,500 so that you can squeeze the most out of it, you lose. If, instead, you ignore the $2,500 and concentrate on the big money – you’re on your way!
ஒரு டாலர் எவ்வளவு?
The parallel for me is the investment we make in our work. If you’ve got the financial resources, worrying about how much you can save on buying a piece of office equipment may be a dumb. Example: So you have an employee making $30/hr who’s work is valued at $70/hr scouring the internet to save $25. If they spent an hour online shopping for the best price on a new printer, you just lost $15. Instead, you should have just bought the first printer you found and sold that employee’s services for $70. You would have made more than $15.
Why more? Because scouring the Internet trying to save a few bucks on a printer sucks and it wasn’t what your employee was hired to do. They would have rather been working on their project, and you would have been better off if they had. They would have met their goals, been on time, and been polished in their craft.
நெவர் பெட் தி மினிமம்
When I was married, I went on a trip to Las Vegas and Laughlin with my wife. I wasn’t a gambler, but her parents were. Her Mom’s only advise to me was always to bet the max. I sat for quite a while playing video blackjack and video poker one night and was dumping $1.25 in at a time. It doesn’t sound like much, but I was in the Navy at the time so I didn’t have too much money. I think our ‘gambling budget’ was $30 each per day.
சிறிது நேரம் கழித்து, என் வாளியின் அடிப்பகுதியைக் கண்டதும், ஒரு நேரத்தில் 4 காலாண்டுகளில் வைக்க ஆரம்பித்தேன் .. பின்னர் 3… பின்னர் 2… பின்னர் 1… நான் ஒரு ராயல் ஃப்ளஷைத் தாக்கினேன். என் மாமியார் என்னை உற்சாகப்படுத்தினார் - அவர். 62.50 செலுத்துவதைக் காணும் வரை. அவள் தாடை கைவிடப்பட்டது. எனது 1.25 25,000 உடன் தொடர்ந்திருந்தால், நான் சுமார் XNUMX டாலர் செல்வந்தராக இருந்திருப்பேன். அதற்கு பதிலாக, நான் மற்றொரு வாளி காலாண்டுகளை வைத்திருந்தேன்.
எனது பாடம் கற்றுக்கொண்டேன்.
உங்கள் பந்தயம் பரப்பவும்
In my current job, I’ve gotten to watch and observe the investors in the business and it was an eye opener. Our investors didn’t empty their savings accounts and cash in their retirements to gamble on us. Instead, they invested in 10 companies and they balance their attention accordingly. They didn’t invest all their time and money in a single business hoping, praying, and stressing that it would make it.
They spread their money in ten businesses and sought to help each business by helping them where they could. Some of our investors simply provide feedback as if they were a client. Some provide financial and some provide technical feedback. They recognize how their strengths could be utilized within each business and they portion it accordingly. I’m quietly amazed as they tell us to blow $25k here and $25k there as if it were nothing. It’s because it is எதுவும் இல்லை.
நாங்கள் அதிகபட்சமாக பந்தயம் கட்டி, வணிகத்தில் கவனம் செலுத்த வேண்டும், சேமிப்புக் கணக்கில் அல்ல.
In other words, they’re not shopping for the lowest cost printer nor do they want us to be.